Home
Fight Corruption
Trade & Industry
Oil & Gas
Power
Aviation
Banking
Insurance
Real Estate
Loans
PSU News
 
Directory
President, PM and Cabinet
MoS Ind. Charge and Ministers of State
Chief Ministers of States
Page last updated at 11:22:48 IST, Thursday, 5 January 2012 News Feeds ::
E-mail this to a friend Printable version Follow merisarkar on Twitter Bookmark and Share
SC restrains NIA from interrogating Malegaon blast accused Purohit
merisarkar news service New Delhi, January 04, 2012
 
Shrikant-Purohit-Malegaon-Blast.jpg
Purohit is accused in Malegaon blast case
The Supreme Court on Wednesday extended its order restraining the National Investigation Agency from interrogating 2008 Malegaon blast accused Lt Col Shrikant Prasad Purohit and Sudhakar Dhar Dwivedi till further direction.

A bench of justices H L Dattu and C K Prasad extended the stay of the Bombay High Court order allowing the agency to interrogate him and also impleaded the NIA on the bail plea of Purohit.

Purohit approached the apex court challenging the High Court's October 20 order allowing NIA to take him from the judicial custody to interrogate him.

The bench asked the NIA, the Centre and the Maharashtra government to file their response within a week and posted the matter for final disposal after two weeks.

On December 16 last year, the bench had stayed the operation of the high court's order.

Dwivedi also challenged the order of the high court and the trial court allowing NIA to take him from judicial custody for his custodial interrogation.

Purohit's bail was rejected on November 9 by the high court which had allowed liberty to another co-accused Ajay Rahirkar on certain conditions.

"Lt. Col Purohit was not just involved in talking about Hindu rashtra but is alleged to have been instrumental in making RDX available," the high court had said while rejecting his bail.

"Reliability of evidence about his bragging to a witness that he had RDX in his possession and the evidence about finding of RDX on a cotton swab would have to be decided at trial. Therefore, he would not be entitled to bail," the high court had said.
 
MORE RELATED NEWS
   EC declares 53 UP seats as 'expenditure sensitive'
  100 million people will be connected by Broadband in 5 years: Sam Pitroda
  71 per cent Indian Companies hiring: Global Survey
  90 per cent tax slapped on AIG bonus recipients
  Airtel Bangladesh crosses five million subscriber mark
  Alka Sirohi asssumes office as member of UPSC
TOP STORIES
 
POLL
Can Singhvi's downfall be attributed to intense negative publicity on social networking sites?
Yes   No
 
 

Copyright © : 2009 Meri Sarkar. New Delhi, India.